Will the next revolution be televised? Not if Senator Kerry wins.

Posted : September 4, 2004 at 12:59 am [America/Los_Angeles]

Thanks to the insane dominance of the two Ms - Money and Media - in American politics and the vitriolic attacks made during the recently concluded Republican National Convention, this Presidential election to many in this country looks like a fight between an incumbent President and a wishy-washy most liberal bum!

Why? Well, here’s how I would explain it:

There are two candidates wanting to become the leader of the Free World.

One of the candidate is the incumbent, has a charming Texan personality, is not very articulate, does not have much of an intellectual curiosity, comes out as arrogant more times than he himself would like and has a record with two catastrophic failures (Iraq and Economy), one glorious success (War against Al Qaeda after 9/11) and many with controversial results (passing of the Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind, Prescription Drugs Plan, etc.).

The other is a bonafide intellectual, somewhat of an introvert with an innocuous and boring countenance. However, he has an impeccable resume. A war veteran indeed a war-hero, an anti-war activist and 19 years of experience as a junior Senator from Massachusetts. While he certainly has had his fair share of noticeable achievements (his work with Sen. McCain around POWs in Vietnam, his investigative work around allegations of illegal gun-running and narcotics trafficking by the CIA and State Department - Iran Contra and BCCI) in all these years of public service as a Senator, he also has quite a few controversial actions (his Senate testimony in 1971, his umpteen votes in the Senate which can easily be misconstrued as anti-Intelligence or an anti-Military although the reality of it is not that simple) against his name.

Seems like an interesting little duel to me so far. Both candidates have a thing or two that stands out. Both also have a few failures to duck against. However, the challenger indeed has one advantage over the incumbent, all things being equal - He is smarter and the catastrophic errors of the incumbent are fresh in people’s minds.

If the 2 Ms (Money and Media) would stay out of these elections or would be used “equally” and “fairly”, the election would be fairly close at this stage with the challenger probably having an edge. However, we know there is no way that the 2 Ms can stay out of US “elections” and there is no way that they can be used “fairly” and “equally”. The result:

Unfortunately for Senator Kerry, President Bush is the one who has raised more than 200 million dollars of cash to spend during this year’s Election campaign (the first M, Money), has the airwaves of FOXNews, CNN and popular talk shows of Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and others of their ilk (the second M, Media) and the political mind of Karl Rove!

Do I think Senator Kerry does not stand a chance? Well, I would have emphatically said “Yup”. However, there is only one thing that is standing between George Bush (with his 2 Ms and Karl Rove) and a certain victory. And that is the power and reach of Internet “blogs” like Kerry & Edwards blog, Eschaton, Daily Kos and many many more like these.

It will be interesting to see if the collective brains and volunteer work of thousands of “common citizens” brought together via these Internet blogs can outwit and outsmart the advantage of President Bush - the 2 Ms and Karl Rove!

So, with that said, will the next revolution be televised? Not if Senator Kerry wins!

- Anand

Viewed: 452 times

2 Comments

It will be interesting to know what is the percentage of people in the US that actually:
1) Has access to the internet.
2) Uses it for things other than read the news (that we know, it is controlled) and play games.

Since I use the internet (and read blogs, etc), it is very easy to mushroom its importance.
Am I being too skeptical?

Posted by: Camila at September 4, 2004 @ 9:43 am

I think I saw a program on C-SPAN a few weeks back which pegged the number of people online and participating in blogs (liberals and conservatives) at 11 million. Not too big a number, but since the last election was won by 537 votes, any number is a BIG number..:-)

Look at it this way. Did we have the power of “blogs” when Al Gore ran. Nope. So, thanks to Blogs, many “new” (and “old”) faces are getting to have a “say” in their candidate’s run for Presidency much before the Election night. And that can always be good!!

Let’s put “blogs” in the context of other sources of News, Views and Opinions:

1. Televion/Cable News: These are slipping away from Liberals fast
2. Radio: Liberals made a big mistake not paying attention when Conservatives ate up almost all of the radio airwaves.
3. Newspapers/Journals: There are a few good ones in this that do present the liberal side of the story. Unfortunately, not many people read newspapers.
4. Internet Sites/Blogs: Liberals must do with the Internet what Conservatives did with Radio. So far the signs look good.

Cheer up! Don’t be skeptical. Blogs have certainly helped. How much? I hope we’re pleasantly surprised when we find it out come Nov. 2nd..;-)

Posted by: Anand Sharma at September 7, 2004 @ 10:36 am